It isn't necessarily an issue that some kinds of voters have the value of their votes artificially inflated or deflated, only that the decision regarding which are deflated and which are inflated is pretty much totally arbitrary.
A common argument in favor of the Electoral College is that it protects the rights of small states versus big ones. However, two-thirds of the senators must be present for voting to take place.
Since the Civil Warall states have chosen presidential electors by popular vote. This year, protestors unhappy with the election results have gathered in a few enclaves to denounce the president-elect.
This would serve to undercut the Electoral College's "indirect democracy" and elevate the idea of a national choice, regardless of state lines. That vote would be taken when the new Congress convenes in January, and it would be a vote of the 50 state delegations with each state having one vote.
It is just a matter of the blatant absurdity of having a democratic system that actively discourages participation on the basis of geographic region. But studying the history of electoral politics in Latin American countries shows how unstable and unfair the direct vote can be.
The electors meet in their respective states 41 days after the popular election. Fault was found from the start with its essentially anti-democratic concept that the people could not or should not be trusted to vote directly for a national leader.
The next step is the selection of a president or chairman of the meeting, sometimes also with a vice chairman. But that is less a product of the Electoral College and more a product of the way states apportion electors. Accessed at The Library of Congress Web site.
Who cares if its fair. Bush a margin of aboutvotes. Faithless electors have never changed the outcome of any presidential election. Trump drew the support of a huge number of states across the South and Midwest, while Clinton racked up massive majorities in the most populous states like New York and California.
Such surprises do not happen often. Although the joint session was suspended, the objections were quickly disposed of and rejected by both Houses of Congress. This, too, strikes many as unfair, not to mention flagrantly undemocratic. This method has been used in Maine since and in Nebraska since Major electoral shifts have happened throughout American history, and will continue to do so as regions and political parties change.
As the election reminded us, the Electoral College does make it possible for a candidate to win the popular vote and still not become president. That deal, fashioned by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, two delegates from Connecticut, was credited with getting the Constitution done and ratified.
For the present, however, here is how the Electoral College votes are apportioned to the states: These are generally medium to large states where neither party has an overwhelming advantage. It can be said consistently that Britain is even less of a democracy than the U. Each state delegation votes en bloc—each delegation having a single vote; the District of Columbia does not receive a vote.
How many times did France have to try before they built a stable republican form of government. The next step is the casting of the vote for vice president, which follows a similar pattern.
A candidate must receive a majority of electoral votes to be elected president. The final tally is printed in the Senate and House journals. Each state is assigned a number equal to its Senate seats always two plus its seats in the House of Representatives.
Nebraska has three districts, so it could split or Bolivia follows a similar pattern. Slaves got an even worse deal, as a slave officially was counted as just three-fifths of a person. Hayes and William A. It has happened four times, most recently in when Al Gore got Constitution does not provide for the popular election of the American president.
Aug 24, · On topic, the Electoral college is maybe not perfect, but basically fair.
Part of the reason why it is fair is because that is the system we have, and. The Electoral College holds its vote t he Join the millions of people who benefit from The Daily Signal’s fair, accurate, trustworthy reporting with direct access to.
The United States Electoral College is a body of electors established by the United States Constitution, constituted every four years for the sole purpose of electing the president and vice president of the United States.
The College consists of electors. The Electoral College was established in Article II, Section I, of the United States Constitution, and was later modified by the Twelfth and Twenty-third amendments, which clarified the process. Maine has two districts, so its vote can be split (as it appears likely to be this year).
Nebraska has three districts, so it could split or The electoral college is a fair way to conduct the presidential election, because of the disparate size of our states.
Because the United States is made up of large and small states, there is a need for the Electoral College.How fair is the electoral college